- To be included: Sentence about or quote from Isaac Dickson talking the excellence of Asheville City Schools
- To be included: Sentence or quote from Lucy Herring, perhaps from “We Did Move Mountains”
- To be included: Sentence on Stephens Lee highlighting Black Excellence in student performance academically and otherwise and in advanced degrees among faculty
When desegregating Asheville City Schools in the late 60’s, early 70’s, the courts required the following areas to be monitored:
- Academic performances
- Disciplinary rates
- Hiring and retention of faculty and staff of color
- Dropout rates
- Graduation rates
Fast Facts & Data
Asheville City Schools Demographics
- White: 63.1% Black: 20.3% Hispanic: 8.2% American Indian: 0.1% Asian: 1.0%
- (NC Department of public instruction 2018)
Early Childhood Education
- During the 2011 – 12 school year, Asheville City Schools provided preschool education to 140 students, of which 58.6% were Black, 9.3% were Hispanic, and 30.7% were White (U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights).
Reading Comprehension
- In Grades 3 through 8 in Asheville City Schools, 35% of Black students and 71% of White students reached proficient or advanced reading levels (2015-2016 School Year, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, combined Asheville City and Buncombe County Schools).
Mathematical Proficiency
- In Grades 3 through 8 in Asheville City Schools, 32% of Black students and 67% of White students reached proficient or advanced reading levels (2015-2016 School Year, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, combined Asheville City and Buncombe County Schools).
Retention
- Black students accounted for 57.1% of retained students as opposed to 17.1% for White students, 9.5% for Hispanic students, and 14.3% for students identified as being mixed race (2011 Survey, U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights).
Suspensions and Expulsions
- Of students without disabilities that received more than one out-of-school suspension in the school year, 70.7% were Black, 4.0% were Hispanic, 9.3% were mixed race, and 14.7% were White (2011 Survey, U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights).
Cohort Graduation Rate
- Asheville High’s cohort graduation rate for the 2012 – 13 school year was 72.6% for Black students, 90.8% for White students, and 58.3% for Hispanic students (NCSchoolReportCard.org).
- The state of North Carolina’s cohort graduation rate for the 2012 – 13 school year was 70.1% for Black students, 86.2% for White students, and 75.2% for Hispanic students (NCSchoolReportCard.org).
Data, videos, and more
General Demographics
Below are the general demographics of Asheville City Schools (ACS) and Buncombe County Schools (BCS) over time.
Asheville City Schools Demographics (White & Black)
Sources
- NC Department of public instruction
Buncombe County Schools Demographics (White & Black)
Use the year select below to view statistics for each year.
Sources
- State Board of Education http://apps.schools.nc.gov/ords/f?p=145:15:::NO:::
Each Asheville City School Demographics by Race and Gender in 2017
2016-2017 race and gender by school – NC Department of public instruction (MT)
Scroll right to see additional data
Sch | total | Whi | W-m | W-F | Bla | B-m | B-f | His | H-m | H-f | 2+ | 2+-m | 2+-f |
All ACS | 4504 | 60.6% 2730 |
30.2% 1360 |
30.4% 1370 |
22.4% 1010 |
11.5% 517 |
10.9% 493 |
8.4% 380 |
4.1% 184 |
4.4% 196 |
6.9% 310 |
3.5% 158 |
3.4% 152 |
AHS | 22.7% 1021 |
61.7% 630 |
30% 306 |
31.7% 324 |
23.5% 240 |
11.8% 120 |
11.8% 120 |
7.2% 74 |
4.5% 46 |
2.7% 28 |
6.2% 63 |
2.5% 26 |
3.6% 37 |
SILSA | 7.8% 351 |
66.4% 233 |
29.3% 103 |
37% 130 |
17.9% 63 |
7.7% 27 |
10.3% 36 |
8.8% 31 |
3.4% 12 |
5.4% 19 |
4.8% 17 |
1.4% 5 |
3.4% 12 |
AMS | 17.7% 796 |
59.7% 475 |
31.3% 249 |
28.4% 226 |
22% 175 |
11.1% 88 |
10.9% 87 |
9.5% 76 |
5.4% 43 |
4.1% 33 |
7.2% 57 |
4% 32 |
3.1% 25 |
Hall Fl Elem | 7.7% 347 |
45% 156 |
23.3% 81 |
21.6% 75 |
32% 111 |
18.7% 65 |
13.3% 46 |
11% 38 |
3.2% 11 |
7.8% 27 |
11.5% 40 |
6.6% 23 |
4.9% 17 |
Isa Dix | 11.7% 525 |
62.1% 326 |
27.2% 143 |
34.9% 183 |
20.2% 106 |
10.7% 56 |
9.5% 50 |
8.8% 46 |
4.4% 23 |
4.4% 23 |
7.4% 39 |
5.7% 30 |
1.7% 9 |
Clax Elem |
10.9% 493 |
62.5% 308 |
31.8% 157 |
30.6% 151 |
22.9% 113 |
11.4% 56 |
11.6% 57 |
5.9% 29 |
1.8% 9 |
4.1% 20 |
7.7% 38 |
3.2% 16 |
4.5% 22 |
Jones Elem |
11.1% 501 |
62.5% 313 |
35.1% 176 |
27.3% 137 |
23.6% 118 |
10.6% 53 |
13% 65 |
5.6% 28 |
2.4% 12 |
3.2% 16 |
5.8% 29 |
2.6% 13 |
3.2% 16 |
Vance Elem |
10.4% 470 |
61.5% 289 |
30.9% 145 |
30.6% 144 |
17.9% 84 |
11.1% 52 |
6.8% 32 |
12.3% 58 |
6% 28 |
6.4% 30 |
5.7% 27 |
2.8% 13 |
3% 14 |
Elementary Schools
|
|||||||||||||
Sch | total | Whi | W-m | W-F | Bla | B-m | B-f | His | H-m | H-f | 2+ | 2+-m | 2+-f |
All Elem | 2336 | 59.6% 1392 |
22.8% 532 |
8.5% 199 |
7.4% 173 |
||||||||
Hall Fl Elem | 7.7% 347 |
45% 156 |
23.3% 81 |
21.6% 75 |
32% 111 |
18.7% 65 |
13.3% 46 |
11% 38 |
3.2% 11 |
7.8% 27 |
11.5% 40 |
6.6% 23 |
4.9% 17 |
Isa Dix | 11.7% 525 |
62.1% 326 |
27.2% 143 |
34.9% 183 |
20.2% 106 |
10.7% 56 |
9.5% 50 |
8.8% 46 |
4.4% 23 |
4.4% 23 |
7.4% 39 |
5.7% 30 |
1.7% 9 |
Clax Elem |
10.9% 493 |
62.5% 308 |
31.8% 157 |
30.6% 151 |
22.9% 113 |
11.4% 56 |
11.6% 57 |
5.9% 29 |
1.8% 9 |
4.1% 20 |
7.7% 38 |
3.2% 16 |
4.5% 22 |
Jones Elem |
11.1% 501 |
62.5% 313 |
35.1% 176 |
27.3% 137 |
23.6% 118 |
10.6% 53 |
13% 65 |
5.6% 28 |
2.4% 12 |
3.2% 16 |
5.8% 29 |
2.6% 13 |
3.2% 16 |
Vance Elem |
10.4% 470 |
61.5% 289 |
30.9% 145 |
30.6% 144 |
17.9% 84 |
11.1% 52 |
6.8% 32 |
12.3% 58 |
6% 28 |
6.4% 30 |
5.7% 27 |
2.8% 13 |
3% 14 |
Sources
- http://apps.schools.nc.gov/ords/f?p=145:15:::NO::
- Spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/148iCtL6wxTBTZlRjITChUr6lZIbzT0VzKMVne7kX8vo/edit?usp=sharing
- Analysis performed by Ashley Cooper
Free and Reduced Lunch
Reports Still Needed: We will add visualizations disaggregated by race and gender as we gather this information.
End of Grade Proficiency Scores for ACS Grades 5-8
Reports Still Needed: We will add school-specific end-of-grade scores for Asheville City Schools as we gather these visualizations.
Reading
Sources
- The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/leaperformancearchive/
Math
Sources
- The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/leaperformancearchive/
Science
Sources
- The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/leaperformancearchive
- Data Source Spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_E6oD3N3C4v-P-z8ZQPCfd_J-WPqUIWwL1JB9Gn-Sww/edit#gid=417637011
End of Grade Proficiency Scores for BCS Grades 5-8
Reports Still Needed: We will add school-specific end-of-grade scores for Buncombe County Schools as we gather these visualizations.
Reading
Sources
- The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/leaperformancearchive/
Math
Sources
- The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/leaperformancearchive/
Science
Sources
- The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/leaperformancearchive/
Useful Links
-
-
- Asheville City Schools
- Buncombe County Schools
- Asheville School Board (meeting minutes)
- AVID
- Source: https://education.unca.edu/avid
- ACSF
- Source: https://www.acsf.org/
- To be completed with local nonprofits and tutoring and mentoring programs
- NC School Report Cards
-
Areas for further research
- Co-curricular Life (Sports, Clubs, Student Government)
- What is being done at the district level and at each individual school to address disparities? What administrative accountability measures are being used? What outcomes are being measured and tracked over time?
- Where do students go who leave the Asheville City and Buncombe County Schools, pre or post graduation?
- Hiring and Retention Rates of ACS and BCS Administrative Staff, showing multiple years
- How have Asheville City Schools complied with the original rules to desegregate schools by desegregating the faculty and hiring Faculty and Staff of Color?
- If the rules for desegregation from the 1970’s were applied today, how would they measure up in all areas including academic performance, hiring and retention of Facult and Staff of Color, disciplinary rates, etc.?
- How effective are Charter Schools and Private Schools in closing disparities?
- AB Tech and UNCA
- Rates of retention for specific cohorts of students between Freshman and Senior year
- Per student spending comparisons between public school, charter school, and private schools.
Areas of Concern
- The persistence of disparate racial outcomes over time indicates the failure of accountability measures. As Superintendents change and Board appointments shift, accountability continues to not exist.
- While City Council appoints the Board of Education, there is disjointed accountability of government oversight, with little report back and performance indicators.
- One year of progress in closing disparities does make up for decades lost. An increase in a couple of points does not negate large decreases over many years.
- The culture of Students of Color is not reflected and expressed in the culture of faculty and administration. The expectations and objectives of the school system are not in synch with the values of the Students of Color.
- We do not know what happens to youth who become adjudicated and do not complete their education in the district.
- Grossly imbalanced disciplinary rates by race and gender.
Factors of resilience and self-sufficiency
- Over the decades, there have programs and community initiatives that were designed to meet challenges of racial disparities. These have included such programs as Project Steam, Homework Stations, Gentleman on the Move, Project Creed. These efforts could be documented, rediscovered, and their value assessed for modern day circumstances.
- The large number of community groups – recognized and unrecognized – that provide tutoring, mentoring, college prep, and life skills. Many of these programs existed without recognition from the schools and with limited resources, but invested heavily in the development of students.
-
- Standard operating procedures — process by which rules are made to determine who is suspended are usually not
- Community input into disciplinary guidelines
- Standard way to review procedures
- Standard operating procedures — process by which rules are made to determine who is suspended are usually not
Historical Tidbits
Historical Tidbits
- The Crown and Scepter Club was the Honor’s Society at Stephens-Lee, symbolic of the high academic achievement Black students. This club did not transfer over to Asheville High after desegregation.
- In 1965, to avoid consolidation of Stephens-Lee High School (Black High School) with Lee Edward’s High School (white High School), Asheville City School Board voted to construct a brand new high school on South French Broad for the Black students. Federal court monitors rejected this as a response to desegregation and then ordered the consolidation of Stephens-Lee HS and Lee Edwards HS into Asheville High School. The newly constructed high school remained empty and later became the site of Asheville Middle School. This building was demolished in 2017 [source needed]
- In the consolidation of the schools, very few of the Black teachers from Stephens-Lee (with Masters degrees) were hired at Asheville High School and none of the trophies from Stephens-Lee were showcased at Asheville High.
Radio/Podcasts
- WRES FM http://www.wresfm.com/
Video
Available on DVD – The Mighty Heroes of Stephens-Lee High School